Pima vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,899,334 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $47,698, a difference of 55.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $107,870, a difference of 47.0%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $90,446, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,678, a difference of 0.34%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,491, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $100,457, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 167.8%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 134.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 123.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 34.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 37.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 166.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 132.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 115.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 86.1%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 68.4%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 78.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 80.4%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 76.5%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 70.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.7%).