Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Serbia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Serbia

Poor
Excellent
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,096
SOCIAL INDEX
88.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
31st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Serbia Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,692,009 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Serbia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 3.7 Immigrants from Serbia.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Serbia Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $50,810, a difference of 65.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $107,569, a difference of 46.6%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $113,463, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,321, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,385, a difference of 22.8%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 23.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Serbia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$50,810
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$113,463
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$91,730
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$51,557
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$60,600
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$43,385
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$53,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$103,155
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$107,569
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$63,387
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Fair
26.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 156.7%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 137.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 111.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 5.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 43.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 47.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Serbia
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
9.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 167.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 131.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 119.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Serbia
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 15.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 9.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Serbia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Fair
36.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 107.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 82.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 6.5%), family households (65.9% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Serbia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
61.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
25.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
28.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 56.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.1%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Serbia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
11.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
88.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
51.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 99.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 90.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 77.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Serbia
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.4%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
69.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
63.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
51.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
44.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 80.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.7%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Serbia Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Serbia
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
45.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%