Pima vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,211,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 5.8 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $48,195, a difference of 57.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $113,519, a difference of 54.7%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $97,297, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,521, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,412, a difference of 22.9%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 139.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 127.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 113.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.51%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 45.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 50.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 151.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 144.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 126.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 91.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 85.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.27, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 39.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 4.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 90.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 86.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 76.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 69.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.7%).