Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ukraine
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Ukraine

Poor
Good
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,807
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
142nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ukraine Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,276,121 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Immigrants from Ukraine. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 49.9 Immigrants from Ukraine.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Ukraine Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $48,134, a difference of 57.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $107,079, a difference of 46.0%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $91,124, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,447, a difference of 7.7%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $61,163, a difference of 21.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Ukraine
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$48,134
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$109,645
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$91,124
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$50,984
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$59,820
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$43,069
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$55,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$102,664
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$107,079
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Average
$61,163
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Good
25.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 117.3%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 115.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 105.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 39.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 54.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Ukraine
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
18.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Average
11.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 145.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 119.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 119.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Ukraine
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Good
5.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 7.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Ukraine
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
74.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Good
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Excellent
83.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 107.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 89.0%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.28%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Ukraine
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
27.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 41.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 5.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Ukraine
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
85.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
50.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
17.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 84.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 79.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.060%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Ukraine
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Fair
97.0%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
91.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
67.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
61.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
41.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 70.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Ukraine Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Ukraine
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Good
11.5%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.7%