Pima vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Arapaho
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,204,615 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.855. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.932% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 931.9 Arapaho.
Pima vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $59,383, a difference of 17.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $44,003, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $71,697, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $41,758, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $75,945, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($38,285 compared to $36,586, a difference of 4.6%).
Income Metric | Pima | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Pima vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 87.9%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 73.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (20.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.7%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Arapaho |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Pima vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 41.6%), male unemployment (8.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and female unemployment (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Pima vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 77.1% |
Pima vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.9%), married-couple households (35.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.82%), average family size (3.75 compared to 3.64, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Arapaho |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 47.1% |
Pima vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 92.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Pima vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (30.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 21.5%), college, 1 year or more (45.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and college, under 1 year (51.4% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.36%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.2% |
Pima vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 37.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.3%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.7%), male disability (12.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Arapaho |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |