Pima vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Cuba
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Cuba
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,764,409 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.472. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 24.9 Immigrants from Cuba.
Pima vs Immigrants from Cuba Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $34,910, a difference of 13.9%), householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $44,735, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $80,662, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($38,285 compared to $38,426, a difference of 0.37%), median family income ($77,431 compared to $78,249, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.2%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Cuba |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $34,910 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $78,249 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $68,461 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $38,426 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $43,461 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $33,291 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $50,374 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $76,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $80,662 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $44,735 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 73.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 66.2%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.8%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Cuba |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Fair 21.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Average 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 20.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 188.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 123.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 108.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 39.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Cuba |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 11.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Cuba |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 72.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 56.9%), married-couple households (35.6% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.9% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Cuba |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 68.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 44.2% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 41.5% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 62.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Cuba |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 91.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.3%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 30.8%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (88.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.74%), 10th grade (91.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Cuba |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 95.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 93.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 93.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 92.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 87.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 80.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 55.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 50.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 39.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 30.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.2% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 66.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 63.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.0%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Cuba |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Fair 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Fair 47.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |