Pima vs Immigrants from France Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from France
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from France

Poor
Excellent
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,515
SOCIAL INDEX
82.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
69th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from France Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,125,892 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.559. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from France. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 16.7 Immigrants from France.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from France Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from France Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $54,557, a difference of 78.0%), median family income ($77,431 compared to $120,076, a difference of 55.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $113,680, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,805, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $44,541, a difference of 26.1%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 29.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from France Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from France
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$54,557
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$120,076
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$96,743
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$53,490
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$63,715
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$44,541
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$53,805
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$108,257
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$113,680
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$66,826
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
27.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from France Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 142.7%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 124.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 101.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 9.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 33.0%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 38.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from France Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from France
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Excellent
11.9%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Good
10.9%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
10.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from France Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 162.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 123.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 120.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from France Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from France
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Average
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
5.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from France Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 8.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from France Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from France
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
35.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Good
83.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from France Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 106.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 77.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.1%), family households (65.9% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from France Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from France
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
61.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
45.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
29.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from France Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 24.9%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.060%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.2%).
Pima vs Immigrants from France Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from France
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
87.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
17.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from France Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 119.3%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 117.1%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 105.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Pima vs Immigrants from France Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from France
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.4%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
87.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
65.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
46.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
20.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from France Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 79.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from France Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from France
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
45.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%