Pima vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,509,082 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.065% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 65.1 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $43,010, a difference of 40.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $99,943, a difference of 36.2%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $85,818, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,201, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,328, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $94,423, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 89.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 84.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 80.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 29.8%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 41.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 140.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 108.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 100.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 57.5%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 58.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 58.2%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 62.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.6%).