Pima vs Dutch Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,257,652 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.235. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Dutch. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 10.3 Dutch.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 40.4%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $42,605, a difference of 39.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $99,650, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,265, a difference of 0.47%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,339, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $93,081, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 171.7%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 134.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 127.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.6%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 37.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 165.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 135.5%), and female unemployment (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 103.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 72.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 63.3%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 106.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 53.9%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 49.2%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 65.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 58.4%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.31%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%).