Pima vs Hopi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,309,390 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hopi within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Hopi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 30.2 Hopi.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $75,002, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $46,978, a difference of 9.6%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($77,431 compared to $77,188, a difference of 0.32%), median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $42,060, a difference of 0.71%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $50,925, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 84.0%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 60.8%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.72%), child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 46.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.6%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.60, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.1%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.0%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.5%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 336.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability (13.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.1%).