Pima vs Indonesian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,385,481 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Indonesians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.798. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.533% in Indonesians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 1,533.4 Indonesians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,300, a difference of 21.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $84,890, a difference of 15.7%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $72,856, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $36,140, a difference of 2.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $79,543, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $54,176, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 98.0%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 80.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 72.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 154.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 151.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 112.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 62.8%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 47.1%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 37.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.7%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 44.5%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.71%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 55.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.5%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.0%).