Pima vs Ute Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Ute
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Ute
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ute Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,046,134 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.951. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 40.2 Ute.
Pima vs Ute Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 31.6%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $36,651, a difference of 19.6%), and median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $48,899, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $82,166, a difference of 0.80%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $34,960, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $49,997, a difference of 3.0%).
Income Metric | Pima | Ute |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $36,651 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $87,596 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $72,402 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $41,051 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $48,899 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $34,960 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $49,997 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $82,166 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $83,937 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $52,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 27.8% |
Pima vs Ute Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Ute communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 84.6%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 77.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (30.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.8%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.8%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Ute |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 16.9% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 25.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 17.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 28.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 35.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Pima vs Ute Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 169.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 107.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Ute |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 11.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Pima vs Ute Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 6.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Ute |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 60.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Good 37.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 76.6% |
Pima vs Ute Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Ute communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 56.0%), single father households (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.0%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Ute |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Average 64.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 44.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 43.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Poor 33.0% |
Pima vs Ute Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Ute |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 11.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Pima vs Ute Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Ute |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Average 96.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Fair 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 91.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 89.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 86.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 81.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 53.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 30.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Pima vs Ute Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.7%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Ute |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 0.86% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 27.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 52.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.5% |