Pima vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,972,797 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.675. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.171% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 171.2 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $38,560, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $78,803, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $90,951, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,626, a difference of 2.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $85,144, a difference of 2.8%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $36,492, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 69.2%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 63.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.0%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 131.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 100.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 88.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 40.2%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.10%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.6%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 37.5%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.73%), high school diploma (81.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 11th grade (88.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 53.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.4%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.1%).