Pima vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,486,055 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,695, a difference of 23.0%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $86,595, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,864, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $81,531, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $48,603, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 85.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 74.2%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 63.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 16.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 20.3%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 97.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 54.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 35.8%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 47.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 5.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 35.6%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 33.5%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 55.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.5%).