Pima vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,741,885 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 6.0 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $96,834, a difference of 32.0%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $83,395, a difference of 31.8%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $39,870, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,365, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,528, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $91,624, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 105.3%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 85.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 79.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 33.5%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 132.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 123.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 106.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 51.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 46.4%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.2%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 43.6%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.080%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 50.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.1%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.7%).