Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Belize Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,177,443 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Belize. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Immigrants from Belize.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $83,141, a difference of 7.9%), per capita income ($41,195 compared to $38,614, a difference of 6.7%), and median household income ($80,341 compared to $75,938, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $53,665, a difference of 0.68%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $89,197, a difference of 4.1%), and median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $37,056, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 9.5%), male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 0.25%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 10.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.050%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.39, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 55.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 11.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 34.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.2%).