Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scottish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Scottish

Poor
Good
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,834
SOCIAL INDEX
65.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
139th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scottish Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,657,758 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 5.1 Scottish.
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Scottish Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 29.6%), householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $61,735, a difference of 14.3%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $104,288, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $38,397, a difference of 0.64%), median earnings ($44,462 compared to $46,463, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $94,622, a difference of 5.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorScottish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Good
$44,440
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Good
$104,288
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Average
$85,101
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Average
$46,463
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Good
$55,793
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Tragic
$38,397
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Tragic
$50,554
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Average
$94,622
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Good
$102,123
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Good
$61,735
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
29.1%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 58.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 57.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.89%), single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorScottish
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
30.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
9.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.3%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorScottish
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
16.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 35.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorScottish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
42.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
82.2%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.6%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.49%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorScottish
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Exceptional
49.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
49.2%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Average
31.7%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 252.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 75.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 22.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 51.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 68.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorScottish
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
93.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
61.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 118.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.8%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorScottish
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Exceptional
67.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Excellent
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Average
38.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
2.0%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 50.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Scottish Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorScottish
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%