Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Mongolian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Mongolians

Poor
Good
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Mongolian Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,020,579 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Mongolians.
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Mongolian Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($92,837 compared to $114,553, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $111,602, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $65,326, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $52,540, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $42,542, a difference of 10.1%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $51,038, a difference of 14.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorMongolian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Exceptional
$49,173
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Exceptional
$114,553
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Exceptional
$93,971
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Exceptional
$51,038
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Exceptional
$60,350
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Exceptional
$42,542
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Good
$52,540
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Exceptional
$104,578
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Exceptional
$111,602
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Exceptional
$65,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Poor
26.6%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 44.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.1%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.3%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorMongolian
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Average
12.4%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Excellent
15.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.5%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.2%), female unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorMongolian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.83%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorMongolian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
83.3%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.8%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.45%), family households (64.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorMongolian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Exceptional
27.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 81.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 14.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 30.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 35.2%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorMongolian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
13.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
87.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
18.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 95.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 61.2%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorMongolian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Fair
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Excellent
91.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Exceptional
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
53.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Exceptional
45.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
19.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.8%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Mongolian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorMongolian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%