Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Syria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,819,584 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Syria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 17.3 Immigrants from Syria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $62,303, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $104,858, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $51,494, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $40,499, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $96,789, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 32.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.36%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.58%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.7%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.59%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 147.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 38.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 44.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.3%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.5%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.47%).