Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,022,662 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.535% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 535.1 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,195 compared to $35,688, a difference of 15.4%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $34,421, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $80,515, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $52,832, a difference of 2.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $86,006, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $50,279, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.5%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.80%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.9%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.41, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (64.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 162.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 79.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 19.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 42.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 67.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.3%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.6%).