Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 259,783,910 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 5.5 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $66,161, a difference of 22.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $108,471, a difference of 18.6%), and median household income ($80,341 compared to $93,899, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $41,114, a difference of 6.4%), per capita income ($41,195 compared to $44,000, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $57,930, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 41.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 41.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.9%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.6%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 178.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 101.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 48.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 77.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.8%).