Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Iraq Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,548,063 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Iraq. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Immigrants from Iraq.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 18.6%), householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $59,824, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $98,201, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $89,444, a difference of 0.26%), per capita income ($41,195 compared to $41,365, a difference of 0.41%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $53,384, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 40.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 39.0%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 27.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.44%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 24.3%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.22%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 219.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 54.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 21.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 43.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 50.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.6%).