Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,650,843 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 31.6 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($92,837 compared to $105,964, a difference of 14.1%), median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $56,958, a difference of 12.9%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $46,430, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $54,593, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $97,305, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.050%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 88.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 14.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.1%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.7%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%).