Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Somalia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,629,493 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Somalia within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Immigrants from Somalia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 36.8 Immigrants from Somalia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $48,135, a difference of 11.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $82,188, a difference of 9.1%), and median household income ($80,341 compared to $74,300, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($92,837 compared to $92,609, a difference of 0.25%), householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $53,333, a difference of 1.3%), and median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $37,914, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 34.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 46.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in family households (64.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 14.3%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 108.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 24.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 16.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.4%), college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.54%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.0%).