Immigrants from Ecuador vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,329,225 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 4.2 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 37.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $65,329, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $110,201, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $39,159, a difference of 1.3%), median earnings ($44,462 compared to $48,304, a difference of 8.6%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $45,195, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 52.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.5%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 53.6%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 52.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.8% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 241.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 68.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 22.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 49.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 62.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.8%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 34.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.4%).