Immigrants from Ecuador vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,362,083 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 35.1 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $48,691, a difference of 10.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $84,235, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $56,615, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $50,408, a difference of 0.13%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $38,391, a difference of 0.66%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $44,118, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 21.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 0.090%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.6%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.53%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 95.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 15.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.1%).