Immigrants from Ecuador vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,687,193 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 43.7 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $64,989, a difference of 20.3%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $108,251, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $103,736, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $53,818, a difference of 0.18%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $96,824, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 41.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.2%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.1%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and family households (64.8% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.23%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 127.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 17.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 31.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 66.8%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.8%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.3%).