Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Immigrants from Scotland
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Immigrants from Scotland
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Scotland Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,044,857 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Immigrants from Scotland.
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Scotland Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 27.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $66,620, a difference of 23.3%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $114,392, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $52,638, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $41,771, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $50,741, a difference of 14.1%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Scotland |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,195 | Exceptional $49,893 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $92,837 | Exceptional $114,392 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $80,341 | Exceptional $94,091 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $44,462 | Exceptional $50,741 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,474 | Exceptional $61,220 |
| Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,644 | Exceptional $41,771 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,722 | Good $52,638 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,673 | Exceptional $105,089 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,462 | Exceptional $112,175 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,030 | Exceptional $66,620 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 28.7% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Scotland Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 67.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 62.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.97%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Scotland |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Families | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Males | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Good 12.7% |
| Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 27.6% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Scotland Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.3%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Scotland |
| Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Females | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.4% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 10.2% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Average 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Good 7.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Scotland Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.97%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Scotland |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Average 79.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 38.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 75.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Excellent 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Scotland Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.17%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Scotland |
| Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Excellent 64.7% |
| Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.12 |
| Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Good 12.0% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.7% | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Scotland Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 186.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 57.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 20.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 55.2%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Scotland |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 91.8% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 58.9% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 20.8% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.2% | Excellent 6.7% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Scotland Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 89.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Scotland |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 93.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Exceptional 96.8% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 96.1% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 95.2% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 89.1% | Exceptional 94.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 93.0% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 84.8% | Exceptional 91.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.0% | Exceptional 88.2% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.7% | Exceptional 69.4% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Exceptional 63.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.7% | Exceptional 42.3% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 17.4% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Scotland Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 34.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.35%), female disability (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Scotland |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.8% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 12.0% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Good 5.6% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Poor 6.8% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Exceptional 21.7% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
| Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Good 6.0% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |