Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Indian (Asian)
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Indians (Asian)

Poor
Good
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,850
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
101st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Indian (Asian) Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,078,517 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 8.5 Indians (Asian).
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Indian (Asian) Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($92,837 compared to $125,312, a difference of 35.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $122,343, a difference of 33.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $119,496, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $58,239, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $46,481, a difference of 20.3%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIndian (Asian)
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Exceptional
$53,874
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Exceptional
$125,312
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Exceptional
$105,262
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Exceptional
$56,253
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Exceptional
$66,078
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Exceptional
$46,481
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Exceptional
$58,239
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Exceptional
$119,496
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Exceptional
$122,343
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Exceptional
$70,238
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Poor
26.4%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 56.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.4%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIndian (Asian)
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Excellent
19.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
13.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
17.9%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
25.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIndian (Asian)
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Average
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 0.54%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIndian (Asian)
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
31.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Tragic
71.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
83.3%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 43.7%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 33.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIndian (Asian)
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
65.1%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Exceptional
25.3%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 69.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 51.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 12.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 31.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 42.6%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIndian (Asian)
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
86.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Tragic
53.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Good
6.4%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 106.6%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 71.4%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIndian (Asian)
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Exceptional
70.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
54.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Exceptional
47.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Indian (Asian) Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorIndian (Asian)
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
8.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%