Immigrants from Ecuador vs Nepalese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,438,032 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.230% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 230.2 Nepalese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $58,761, a difference of 8.8%), per capita income ($41,195 compared to $38,442, a difference of 7.2%), and median household income ($80,341 compared to $82,410, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $38,603, a difference of 0.11%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $43,860, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.5%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and poverty (14.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.2%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 0.64%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.42, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 222.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 106.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 86.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 21.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 51.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 86.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 29.7%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (91.8% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.16%), 10th grade (90.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and 6th grade (95.3% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 33.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.4%).