Immigrants from Ecuador vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,108,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 22.1%), householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $61,270, a difference of 13.4%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $104,282, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $39,109, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $51,247, a difference of 4.8%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $46,916, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 49.1%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 43.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.67%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 31.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.7%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.32%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 147.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 74.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 18.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 43.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 60.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 76.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.7%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.0%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.91%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.9%).