Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,356,900 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.541. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 41.7 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $61,843, a difference of 14.5%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $104,966, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $102,190, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $52,611, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $40,704, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $95,322, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 43.2%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 42.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (64.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 126.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 32.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 17.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.6%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%).