Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Chinese
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Chinese
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
2.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
2.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chinese Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,835,557 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 0.16%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.96% | 0.55% |
| Maximum | 4.1% | 8.0% |
| Range | 3.1% | 7.4% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.8% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.76% | 0.82% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.66% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.65% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Chinese by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Guamanian/Chamorro (2.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Philippines (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guatemalan (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Albanian (2.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Philippines (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guatemalan (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Osage (2.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Spaniards | 3.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.6% |
| French Canadians | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Osage | 3.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Iraqis | 3.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Chinese | 2.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 2.7 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Guatemalans | 2.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 2.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Liberians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Vietnamese | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Bahamians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Bermudans | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Senegalese | 1.3 /100 | #238 | Tragic 2.6% |