Arapaho vs Comanche Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Comanche
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Comanche
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Comanche Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,914,871 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.970. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.361% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 361.1 Comanche.
Arapaho vs Comanche Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $38,088, a difference of 17.7%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $48,202, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $82,152, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.7%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $88,556, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $47,518, a difference of 8.0%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Comanche |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Tragic $38,088 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Tragic $88,556 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Tragic $73,747 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Tragic $41,519 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Tragic $48,202 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Tragic $35,661 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Tragic $47,518 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Tragic $82,152 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Tragic $85,787 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Tragic $54,922 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Excellent 25.0% |
Arapaho vs Comanche Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.9%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.8%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.50%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Comanche |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 16.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 21.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 20.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 16.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 33.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Arapaho vs Comanche Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 136.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 104.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (10.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 97.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Comanche |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 20.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Arapaho vs Comanche Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Comanche |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Exceptional 37.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Good 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Tragic 79.2% |
Arapaho vs Comanche Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 28.3%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.25, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (66.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Comanche |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 36.7% |
Arapaho vs Comanche Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 39.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 26.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Comanche |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Excellent 56.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Arapaho vs Comanche Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Comanche |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Good 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Fair 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Tragic 61.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 39.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Arapaho vs Comanche Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Comanche |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 28.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 51.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |