Arapaho vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,619,408 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.523. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 16.2 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $49,448, a difference of 52.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $112,484, a difference of 48.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $105,223, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $65,209, a difference of 9.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $53,552, a difference of 21.7%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 76.1%), single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 68.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 65.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.1%), single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 145.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 138.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 134.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 59.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.5%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.8%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 47.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 31.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 93.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 87.2%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 77.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 39.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 31.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.4%).