Arapaho vs Yakama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 2,238,613 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.310% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 310.3 Yakama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $54,321, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $86,992, a difference of 14.5%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $45,002, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 1.2%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $33,009, a difference of 2.1%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $83,932, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 51.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 44.2%), and single male poverty (21.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.12%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 187.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 128.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (10.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 82.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.2%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 4.3%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.5%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 38.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 68.8%), college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 27.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), disability (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.5%).