Arapaho vs Thai Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,279,728 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Thais within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.715. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.294% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 293.5 Thais.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Thai communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $72,135, a difference of 72.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $129,560, a difference of 70.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $121,778, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $72,099, a difference of 21.4%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 29.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $59,187, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Thai communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 104.0%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 89.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 87.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 36.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 200.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 171.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (10.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 161.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 96.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.9%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.22, a difference of 12.9%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Thai communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 33.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Thai communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 137.0%), master's degree (10.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 117.2%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 113.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.070%), 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Thai communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 75.6%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 62.9%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 9.7%).