Arapaho vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,094,338 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 33.7 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $41,195, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $89,673, a difference of 25.1%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $38,644, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $54,030, a difference of 9.9%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $92,837, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 74.9%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 47.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 142.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 107.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 102.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 39.6%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 224.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 120.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 97.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 21.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 48.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 97.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.5%), master's degree (10.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 35.9%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 1.4%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 67.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 40.7%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.0%).