Arapaho vs Ute Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Ute
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Ute
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ute Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,480,204 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.212. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 Ute.
Arapaho vs Ute Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 18.4%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $48,899, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $82,166, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,965 compared to $72,402, a difference of 6.5%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $87,596, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $83,937, a difference of 10.5%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Ute |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Tragic $36,651 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Tragic $87,596 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Tragic $72,402 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Tragic $41,051 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Tragic $48,899 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Tragic $34,960 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Tragic $49,997 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Tragic $82,166 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Tragic $83,937 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Tragic $52,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Tragic 27.8% |
Arapaho vs Ute Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 39.9%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and male poverty (15.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Ute |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 25.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 17.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 15.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 28.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 35.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Arapaho vs Ute Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 193.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 140.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 124.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Ute |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Arapaho vs Ute Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.60%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Ute |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 60.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Good 37.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Tragic 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Tragic 76.6% |
Arapaho vs Ute Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 42.7%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.090%), single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Ute |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Average 64.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 44.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Tragic 43.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Poor 33.0% |
Arapaho vs Ute Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 57.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Ute |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Arapaho vs Ute Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.8%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Ute |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Average 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Fair 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Tragic 91.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 89.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Tragic 86.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 81.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 53.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 30.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Arapaho vs Ute Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 47.8%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Ute |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 0.86% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 27.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 52.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.5% |