Arapaho vs Hungarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,756,291 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 14.1 Hungarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $45,426, a difference of 40.4%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $57,309, a difference of 37.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $103,913, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $61,673, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $50,247, a difference of 14.2%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 59.2%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 43.9%), and male poverty (15.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 11.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 143.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 133.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 127.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 50.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.6%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.18, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 46.2%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 34.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.0%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 61.3%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.4%).