Arapaho vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,196,478 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.580. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 43.5 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $101,580, a difference of 33.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $92,385, a difference of 28.9%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $86,498, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $65,427, a difference of 10.2%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $37,498, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 88.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 73.7%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 139.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 133.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 120.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 44.4%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.42, a difference of 6.3%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.9%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.31%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.8%), bachelor's degree (26.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%).