Arapaho vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,772,470 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.808. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.255% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 255.2 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $44,076, a difference of 36.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $103,071, a difference of 35.7%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $55,731, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $61,621, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,493, a difference of 17.0%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $37,904, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 64.0%), single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 59.2%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 12.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and single female poverty (26.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 142.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 141.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 138.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 54.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.5%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.15, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 69.1%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.7%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 29.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.2%).