Arapaho vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,480,972 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.241% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 240.8 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $49,173, a difference of 52.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $111,602, a difference of 46.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $104,578, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $65,326, a difference of 10.0%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $52,540, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 80.4%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 57.2%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 194.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 149.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 145.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 68.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.4%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.9%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 78.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 61.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 46.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 136.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 113.4%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 94.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.26%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 48.7%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.0%).