Arapaho vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,697,111 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 37.6 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $45,047, a difference of 39.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $103,472, a difference of 36.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $96,667, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $61,177, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $50,923, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 78.1%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 47.5%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 161.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 151.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 126.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 56.6%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 4.8%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households (66.5% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 63.4%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 48.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 90.8%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 77.9%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 71.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.18%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 9.0%).