Arapaho vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,784,125 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Crow within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 24.7 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.1%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $49,234, a difference of 20.6%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $35,266, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $71,337, a difference of 0.50%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $42,434, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $31,729, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 45.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 34.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.1%), single male poverty (21.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 220.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 198.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and male unemployment (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 21.1%), births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (40.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.43%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (66.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.4%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.6%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.17%), college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and 9th grade (95.7% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.54%).