Arapaho vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,041,892 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.908. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 94.1 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $43,997, a difference of 36.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $91,171, a difference of 27.2%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $52,860, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $56,975, a difference of 4.2%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $52,302, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 85.0%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 54.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 148.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 140.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 137.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 39.0%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.1%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 72.9%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 62.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 54.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 58.7%), master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 49.8%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 45.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.73%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 7.3%).