Arapaho vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,635,658 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 62.5 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,022, a difference of 16.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $85,965, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $80,012, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($82,064 compared to $85,050, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $33,953, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 59.5%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 49.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 0.41%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 114.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 107.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 105.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 25.8%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 2.7%), single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.49, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 21.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 71.7%), college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.40%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.7%).