Arapaho vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,382,630 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $59,066, a difference of 82.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $128,723, a difference of 79.5%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $74,224, a difference of 77.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 26.6%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $76,686, a difference of 29.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $57,740, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 106.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 99.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 90.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 19.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 32.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 210.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 166.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (10.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 154.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 105.0%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.0%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.87%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.20, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 194.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 163.0%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 134.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.13%), 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 87.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 9.7%).