Arapaho vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,291,882 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.978. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.170% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 170.1 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $50,044, a difference of 54.7%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $61,460, a difference of 47.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $109,719, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $65,652, a difference of 10.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,383, a difference of 16.8%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South African communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 71.5%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 53.8%), and single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 160.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 137.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 133.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 54.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.7%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.8%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 50.7%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 39.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 37.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 100.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 98.2%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.080%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 41.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.6%).