Arapaho vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,495,270 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 46.7 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $47,722, a difference of 24.4%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $70,989, a difference of 15.6%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $59,159, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $42,098, a difference of 0.81%), median earnings ($36,586 compared to $36,999, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $42,380, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 80.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 52.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (21.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 15.5%), single female poverty (26.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 41.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (10.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.4%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.65, a difference of 0.27%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 18.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.8%), bachelor's degree (26.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and associate's degree (36.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.6%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.8%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.9%).